Un reto multidisciplinar: tratamiento con fósforo-32 en el carcinoma de páncreas localmente avanzado / A multidisciplinary challenge: Therapy with phosphorus-32 for locally advanced pancreatic cancer

El cáncer de páncreas es una enfermedad de pronóstico precario, siendo su supervivencia global la que menos ha mejorado en los últimos 40 años entre todos los cánceres. El adenocarcinoma de páncreas localmente avanzado, sin metástasis a distancia, pero con una afectación vascular limitante, constituye casi un tercio de estos pacientes. En este grupo se concentran gran parte de los esfuerzos investigadores para introducir tratamientos que permitan un aumento de las tasas de rescate quirúrgico y/o de la supervivencia, con 2 objetivos fundamentales: el del control local y el de la prevención de la progresión sistémica. El tratamiento intratumoral con micropartículas de fósforo-32, guiado por ecoendoscopia y combinado con quimioterapia estándar puede tener beneficios significativos y clínicamente relevantes en estos pacientes y, por tanto, una opción valiosa de tratamiento en una enfermedad en la que existe una necesidad urgente de desarrollar nuevas terapias que nos ayuden a mejorar los resultados (AU)

Pancreatic cancer is a disease with a poor prognosis, and overall survival has improved the least in the last 40 years of all cancers. Locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma, without distant metastasis but with limiting vascular involvement, constitutes almost one third of these patients. This group is the focus of most research efforts to introduce treatments to increase surgical salvage rates and/or survival, with two main objectives: local control and prevention of systemic progression. Intratumoural treatment with phosphorus-32 microparticles, guided by echoendoscopy and combined with standard chemotherapy may have significant and clinically relevant benefits in these patients, and therefore a valuable treatment option in a disease where there is an urgent need to develop new therapies to help improve outcomes (AU)

A multidisciplinary challenge: Therapy with phosphorus-32 for locally advanced pancreatic cancer.

Pancreatic cancer is a disease with a poor prognosis, and overall survival has improved the least in the last 40 years of all cancers. Locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma, without distant metastasis but with limiting vascular involvement, constitutes almost one third of these patients. This group is the focus of most research efforts to introduce treatments to increase surgical salvage rates and/or survival, with two main objectives: local control and prevention of systemic progression. Intratumoural treatment with phosphorus-32 microparticles, guided by echoendoscopy and combined with standard chemotherapy may have significant and clinically relevant benefits in these patients, and therefore a valuable treatment option in a disease where there is an urgent need to develop new therapies to help improve outcomes.

Papel de los factores inflamatorios sistémicos en los tumores neuroendocrinos gastroenteropancreáticos (TNE-GEP) tratados con péptidos marcados con radionúclidos (PRRT): de la biología a la teragnosis / Role of systemic inflammatory factors in gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs) treated with peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT): From biology to theragnosis

Objetivo Los índices inflamatorios sistémicos se han validado como indicadores de inflamación sistémica como marcadores predictivos de mal pronóstico para diversas enfermedades oncológicas. Sin embargo, se desconoce el impacto pronóstico de los marcadores de inflamación sistémica en pacientes con tumores neuroendocrinos gastroenteropancreáticos (TNE-GEP) tratados con péptidos marcados con radionúclidos (PRRT). Métodos Realizamos un estudio observacional, retrospectivo, multicéntrico de 40 pacientes con TNEs-GEP y TNE de origen desconocido tratados con PRRT entre el 2016 y el 2020. Los marcadores inflamatorios sistémicos se calcularon de la siguiente manera: relación neutrófilos a linfocitos (NLR)=recuento de neutrófilos/recuento de linfocitos, relación de monocitos a linfocitos (MLR)=recuento de monocitos/recuento de linfocitos, relación de plaquetas a linfocitos (PLR)=recuento de plaquetas/recuento de linfocitos, relación de albúmina a linfocitos (ALR)=niveles de albúmina/recuento de linfocitos y relación derivada de neutrófilos a linfocitos (dNLR)=recuento de neutrófilos/(recuento de leucocitos – recuento de neutrófilos). Se utilizaron datos analíticos basales pretratamiento y después de la segunda dosis para el cálculo de los distintos índices. Resultados La mediana de edad fue de 63 años (rango 41-85), el 55% eran hombres. Los valores de corte de referencia para NLR fueron 2,61, para MLR 0,31, para PLR 110,14, para ALR 2,39 y para dNLR 1,71. Los valores de corte después de la segunda dosis fueron, para NLR 2,3, para MLR 0,3, para PLR 131,61, ALR 4,16 y dNLR 1,48. La mediana de la sobrevivencia libre de progresión (SLP) fue de 21,7 meses (IC del 95%: 10,7-32,8 m) y la supervivencia global (SG) fue de 32,1 meses (IC del 95%: 19,6-44,7 m), la SLP fue más corta en pacientes con NLR elevado (p=0,001), ALR (0,03) y dNLR (p=0,001) en el análisis basal. La tasa de control de enfermedad (DCR) fue del 81% y la tasa de respuesta objetiva (ORR) del 18% (AU)

Aim Systemic inflammatory factors have been validated as indicators of ongoing systemic inflammation that could be predictive markers of poor prognosis for oncological outcomes. However, the prognostic impact of systemic inflammation markers is unknown in patients with gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs) treated with peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT). Methods We conducted an observational, retrospective, multicentric study of 40 patients with GEP or unknown origin NETs treated with PRRT between 2016 and 2020. The systemic inflammatory markers were calculated as follows: neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR)=neutrophil count/lymphocyte count, monocyte to lymphocyte ratio (MLR)=monocyte count/lymphocyte count, platelet to lymphocyte ratio (PLR)=platelet count/lymphocyte count, albumin to lymphocyte ratio (ALR)=albumin levels/lymphocyte count and derived Neutrophil to Lymphocyte ratio (dNLR)=neutrophil count/(leucocytes count – neutrophils count). Baseline analysis and after the second dose were used for the calculation of different ratios. Results The median age was 63 years (range 41–85), 55% were male. The baseline cut-off values for NLR were 2.61, for MLR 0.31, for PLR 110.14, for ALR 2.39 and for dNLR 1.71. The cut-off values after the 2° dose were, for NLR 2.3, for MLR 0.3, for PLR 131.61, ALR 4.16, and dNLR 1.48. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 21.7 months (95% CI 10.7–32.8 months) and overall survival (OS) was 32.1 months (95% CI 19.6–44.7 months), PFS was shorter in patients with elevated NLR (P=0.001), ALR (0.03), and dNLR (P=0.001) in baseline analysis. DCR was 81% and ORR 18%. Conclusions In GEP or unknown origin NETs treated with PRRT, we have identified the predictive and prognostic impact of baseline systemic inflammatory factors (AU)

Role of systemic inflammatory factors in gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs) treated with peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT): From biology to theragnosis.

AIM: Systemic inflammatory factors have been validated as indicators of ongoing systemic inflammation that could be predictive markers of poor prognosis for oncological outcomes. However, the prognostic impact of systemic inflammation markers is unknown in patients with gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs) treated with peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT). METHODS: We conducted an observational, retrospective, multicentric study of 40 patients with GEP or unknown origin NETs treated with PRRT between 2016 and 2020. The systemic inflammatory markers were calculated as follows: neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR)=neutrophil count/lymphocyte count, monocyte to lymphocyte ratio (MLR)=monocyte count/lymphocyte count, platelet to lymphocyte ratio (PLR)=platelet count/lymphocyte count, albumin to lymphocyte ratio (ALR)=albumin levels/lymphocyte count and derived Neutrophil to Lymphocyte ratio (dNLR)=neutrophil count/(leucocytes count - neutrophils count). Baseline analysis and after the second dose were used for the calculation of different ratios. RESULTS: The median age was 63 years (range 41-85), 55% were male. The baseline cut-off values for NLR were 2.61, for MLR 0.31, for PLR 110.14, for ALR 2.39 and for dNLR 1.71. The cut-off values after the 2° dose were, for NLR 2.3, for MLR 0.3, for PLR 131.61, ALR 4.16, and dNLR 1.48. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 21.7 months (95% CI 10.7-32.8 months) and overall survival (OS) was 32.1 months (95% CI 19.6-44.7 months), PFS was shorter in patients with elevated NLR (p=0.001), ALR (0.03), and dNLR (p=0.001) in baseline analysis. DCR was 81% and ORR 18%. CONCLUSIONS: In GEP or unknown origin NETs treated with PRRT, we have identified the predictive and prognostic impact of baseline systemic inflammatory factors.

Terapia con péptidos radiomarcados con [177Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE / Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy with [177Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE

Esta formación pretende presentar, de forma clara y de fácil comprensión, la biología de los tumores neuroendocrinos (TNE), las características de los receptores de somatostatina, cómo debe realizarse la selección de pacientes candidatos a terapia con péptidos radiomarcados (PRRT), si el paciente cumple los criterios para beneficiarse del tratamiento con los mínimos efectos adversos posibles, el protocolo de administración, seguimiento y evaluación de respuesta. También, se desarrollan los estudios de imagen funcional necesarios para explorar la biología del tumor e individualizar el tratamiento, que constituyen la piedra angular para el desarrollo de la teragnosis.Se están desarrollando ensayos clínicos para definir mejor la posición de PRRT dentro del amplio panorama terapéutico y, entre las perspectivas de futuro, hay varias líneas de investigación para mejorar la tasa de respuesta objetiva y la supervivencia con PRRT, centradas en el desarrollo de nuevos agonistas y antagonistas del receptor de somatostatina, nuevos radionúclidos y terapias combinadas radiosensibilizantes.En conclusión, la PRRT es un tratamiento bien tolerado, seguro y con efectos secundarios agudos, generalmente leves y autolimitados, que constituye una gran herramienta terapéutica que debe secuenciarse en el mejor momento de la evolución de la enfermedad de los pacientes con TNE. Los pacientes candidatos a la PRRT deben ser valorados siempre por un comité clínico multidisciplinar (AU)

This continuing education aims to present in a clear and easy-to-understand way, the biology of neuroendocrine tumors (NETs), the characteristics of somatostatin receptors, the selection of patients for radiolabelled peptide therapy (PRRT), the inclusion criteria to benefit from treatment with the minimum possible adverse effects, the administration protocol, follow-up and response evaluation. The functional imaging studies necessary to explore the biology of the tumor and to individualize the treatment are also carried out, and constitute the cornerstone for the development of teragnosis.Clinical trials are being developed to better define the position of PRRT within the broad therapeutic options, and among the future perspectives, there are several lines of research to improve the objective response rate and survival with PRRT, focused on the development of new agonists and somatostatin receptor antagonists, new radionuclides and radiosensitizing combination therapies.In conclusion, PRRT is a great therapeutic, well-tolerated and safe tool with generally mild and self-limited acute side effects, that must be sequenced at the best moment of the evolution of the disease of patients with NET. Candidate patients for PRRT should always be evaluated by an multidisciplinary clinical committee (AU)

Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy with [177Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE.

This continuing education aims to present in a clear and easy-to-understand way, the biology of neuroendocrine tumors (NETs), the characteristics of somatostatin receptors, the selection of patients for radiolabelled peptide therapy (PRRT), the inclusion criteria to benefit from treatment with the minimum possible adverse effects, the administration protocol, follow-up and response evaluation. The functional imaging studies necessary to explore the biology of the tumor and to individualize the treatment are also carried out, and constitute the cornerstone for the development of teragnosis. Clinical trials are being developed to better define the position of PRRT within the broad therapeutic options, and among the future perspectives, there are several lines of research to improve the objective response rate and survival with PRRT, focused on the development of new agonists and somatostatin receptor antagonists, new radionuclides and radiosensitizing combination therapies. In conclusion, PRRT is a great therapeutic, well-tolerated and safe tool with generally mild and self-limited acute side effects, that must be sequenced at the best moment of the evolution of the disease of patients with NET. Candidate patients for PRRT should always be evaluated by a multidisciplinary clinical committee.

177Lu-DOTATATE treatment in neuroendocrine tumours. A preliminary study. / Tratamiento con 177LU-DOTATATE en tumores neuroendocrinos. Estudio preliminar.

Therapy with radiolabelled somatostatin analogue peptides is a promising new therapy to treat neuroendocrine tumours. The aim of this preliminary study is to present our experience with 177Lu-DOTATATE therapy, and evaluate tolerability and short-term efficacy in patients with tumours expressing somatostatin receptors. A total of 7 patients with metastatic neuroendocrine tumours were treated, each with 4 doses of 177Lu-DOTATATE. The treatment response was evaluated in the form of biochemical response (tumour markers), imaging methods (somatostatin receptor scintigraphy, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance), and functional and quality of life responses using the Karnofsky performance status scale. Treatment toxicity was also evaluated. The results obtained were as follows: Biochemical response: 60% of patients showed tumour marker levels returning to normal, while they decreased significantly in the remaining 40%. Imaging response: 85.7% had a partial response, while 14.3% showed stable disease. All (100%) patients showed a significant improvement in quality of life, with increased Karnofsky scale scores. No patient had acute or chronic toxicity, and subacute transient haematological toxicity was observed in 42.8% of patients. Despite being a preliminary study, it was found that treatment with 177Lu-DOTATATE is a safe treatment with few side effects, and an objective response was achieved in most patients.